Skip to main content
AI IN FACT MUSEUM
Exhibit Objects Compare Now Collection History Sources
中文

OBJECT ROOM / FOUNDATIONAL RECORDS

Follow the records that changed how intelligence was built.

A museum object is not another definition. It is a record made at a particular moment: a machine, paper, proposal, research book, or release page that lets us inspect what people actually built and claimed then.

19objects on view
1943—2022date range

Records and commentary remain distinct from originals. Any reproduced photograph carries its own creator, source, rights basis, and change notice.

GUIDED PATH / 12 TURNS

From written rules to learned representations

This is not a march toward one inevitable machine. Twelve selected records separate formal rules, physical learning machinery, bounded perception–planning–action, encoded expertise, learned representations, specialised computation, memory, scale, shared control, search, architecture, and public access.

  1. 01 01 / FORMALISE 1943

    A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity

    Idealised neural events become logical operations.

  2. 02 02 / BUILD A LEARNER 1958

    Electronic Neural Network, Mark I Perceptron

    A room-scale electronic assembly gives the perceptron a physical form.

  3. 03 03 / CONNECT PERCEPTION TO ACTION 1969

    Shakey

    A wheeled body, radio link, and remote computer close a bounded planning loop.

  4. 04 04 / ENCODE EXPERTISE 1984

    Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments

    A research programme writes domain knowledge as inspectable rules.

  5. 05 05 / LEARN REPRESENTATIONS 1986

    Learning representations by back-propagating errors

    Weights change as output error travels backward through the network.

  6. 06 06 / SPECIALISE COMPUTATION 1997

    Deep Blue custom chess chip, version 2

    A custom chip turns bounded chess search into dedicated hardware.

  7. 07 07 / HOLD CONTEXT 1997

    Long Short-Term Memory

    A gated recurrent method is designed to keep error signals available across long intervals.

  8. 08 08 / SCALE AN EXPERIMENT 2012

    ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

    A deep convolutional network meets ImageNet and a GPU implementation.

  9. 09 09 / SHARE CONTROL 2014

    SAFFiR aboard ex-USS Shadwell

    A humanoid research platform tests perception and action while an operator remains able to intervene.

  10. 10 10 / LEARN AND SEARCH 2016

    Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search

    Policy and value networks guide tree search inside the game of Go.

  11. 11 11 / CHANGE ARCHITECTURE 2017

    Attention Is All You Need

    The paper’s encoder–decoder uses attention without recurrence or convolution.

  12. 12 12 / REACH THE PUBLIC 2022

    Introducing ChatGPT

    A research preview turns model interaction into a public conversational interface.

011943021950031950041955051958061966071969081973091984101986111989121997131997142009152012162014172016182017192022
  1. 01

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-1943-001

    A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity

    A formal model that treated idealised neural events as logical propositions.

    1943
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Warren S. McCulloch · Walter Pitts

    A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Springer Nature
    1943

    Why it is here

    Under explicit “all-or-none” assumptions, McCulloch and Pitts described neural events and their relations with propositional logic, then related qualifying logical expressions to possible nets.

    What to notice

    Start with the assumptions. This is neither a literal map of the brain nor a trainable modern neural network; it is a deliberately simplified calculus.

    Creator
    Warren S. McCulloch · Walter Pitts
    Date
    1943-12
    Publisher / holder
    The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, Springer Nature
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  2. 02

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-1950-001

    Computing Machinery and Intelligence

    A paper that replaced an untestable question with an observable game.

    1950
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Alan M. Turing

    Computing Machinery and Intelligence Mind, Oxford University Press
    1950

    Why it is here

    Turing did not settle whether machines think. He proposed a practical way to examine machine behaviour through language, and then worked through objections to that proposal.

    What to notice

    Notice the move from defining “thinking” to describing a testable encounter. That change of method is the object’s lasting importance.

    Creator
    Alan M. Turing
    Date
    1950-10
    Publisher / holder
    Mind, Oxford University Press
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  3. 03

    PHYSICAL INSTRUMENT / AIM-ROB-1950-001

    Grey Walter cybernetic tortoise

    A compact 1950–1952 cybernetic machine connected light and touch responses to motion without a general-purpose digital computer.

    1950
    PRIMARY RECORD

    William Grey Walter · Burden Neurological Institute

    Grey Walter cybernetic tortoise Science Museum Group Collection
    1950

    Why it is here

    The Science Museum Group records a photoelectric cell, movement around floors, obstacle and slope avoidance, and different responses to moderate and bright light. The object makes an early cybernetic argument tangible: a few feedback relationships could produce behaviour that looked richer than any single response, without demonstrating learning, deliberation, or general intelligence.

    What to notice

    Do not identify this catalogue entry as an original Elmer or Elsie. A 2008 University of Bristol account distinguishes a surviving original at UWE from a replica in the Science Museum, while the current catalogue dates L2000-4441 to 1950–1952 and credits UWE Bristol; these records do not fully resolve the object's identity or current display status. The catalogue image is not reproduced because its CC BY-NC-SA licence restricts commercial use.

    Creator
    William Grey Walter · Burden Neurological Institute
    Date
    1950
    Publisher / holder
    Science Museum Group Collection
    Collection
    Science Museum Group Collection; credit UWE Bristol · L2000-4441
    Physical size
    Overall: 260 mm × 265 mm × 360 mm × 2.524 kg
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  4. 04

    PROPOSAL / AIM-DOC-1955-001

    Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence

    The project proposal that put “artificial intelligence” in its title.

    1955
    PRIMARY RECORD

    John McCarthy · Marvin Minsky · Nathaniel Rochester · Claude Shannon

    Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence John McCarthy archive, Stanford University
    1955

    Why it is here

    The organisers proposed a two-month study for the summer of 1956. Its agenda joined language, abstraction, neural networks, creativity, and self-improvement under one research programme.

    What to notice

    Read it as a proposal, not a victory report. The confidence, open problems, participant plans, and budget all reveal a field being organised before its outcomes were known.

    Creator
    John McCarthy · Marvin Minsky · Nathaniel Rochester · Claude Shannon
    Date
    1955-08-31
    Publisher / holder
    John McCarthy archive, Stanford University
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  5. 05

    PHYSICAL INSTRUMENT / AIM-EQP-1958-001

    Electronic Neural Network, Mark I Perceptron

    An electronic assembly built at the Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory gave Rosenblatt’s perceptron a physical form.

    1958
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Frank Rosenblatt · Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory team

    Electronic Neural Network, Mark I Perceptron National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution
    1958

    Why it is here

    The Smithsonian catalogue dates the Mark I Perceptron to 1958 and describes sensory, association, and response units distributed across cabinets, switches, a plugboard, potentiometers, and meters. The surviving equipment makes an abstract learning proposal inspectable as a manufactured system.

    What to notice

    This is not a modern deep network or evidence that the machine fulfilled contemporary predictions about human-like intelligence. The Smithsonian record is still subject to revision, says the object is not currently on display, and applies separate reuse conditions to its images; no image is reproduced here.

    Creator
    Frank Rosenblatt · Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory team
    Date
    1958
    Publisher / holder
    National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution
    Collection
    National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution · 1987.0819.01
    Physical size
    part 1: 199.4 × 194.3 × 64.1 cm · part 2: 200.6 × 146 × 64.7 cm
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  6. 06

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-1966-001

    ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine

    The paper behind a conversation that felt richer than its mechanism.

    1966
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Joseph Weizenbaum

    ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine Communications of the ACM
    1966

    Why it is here

    Weizenbaum described ELIZA as a program for studying natural-language communication. Its operation depended on decomposition rules, keyword ranking, and reassembly—not on a general understanding of the conversation.

    What to notice

    Compare the modest mechanism with the human tendency to supply meaning. The gap between a system’s operation and a visitor’s interpretation remains a live museum question.

    Creator
    Joseph Weizenbaum
    Date
    1966-01
    Publisher / holder
    Communications of the ACM
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  7. 07

    PHYSICAL INSTRUMENT / AIM-ROB-1969-001

    Shakey

    A wheeled robot linked cameras and touch sensors to a large remote computer for bounded room tasks.

    1969
    Shakey behind glass: stacked white and black equipment housings rise above a circular wheeled base.

    The surviving Shakey robot photographed on display at the Computer History Museum on 10 January 2007.

    “Shakey.png” — Marshall Astor; Sanchom (source crop) Image rights: CC-BY-SA-2.0 · Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic ↗

    Why it is here

    The Computer History Museum dates Shakey to 1969, records an overall size of 69 × 47 × 47 inches, and names SRI as manufacturer. The object makes a distributed early robot system visible: cameras and touch sensors on a mobile body, computation elsewhere, and instructions translated into planned actions.

    What to notice

    Do not read this as general or fully onboard autonomy. The catalogue explicitly places control in a large remote computer, while the surviving body carried sensors and motion hardware. Its current display status was checked on 11 September 2026, not promised permanently. The copyrighted catalogue image is not reproduced; the separate 2007 visitor photograph shown here carries its own CC BY-SA 2.0 record.

    Creator
    Stanford Research Institute (SRI)
    Date
    1969
    Publisher / holder
    Computer History Museum
    Collection
    Computer History Museum · X279.83
    Physical size
    Overall: 69 in × 47 in × 47 in
    Display note
    Licensed photograph · CC-BY-SA-2.0
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  8. 08

    PHYSICAL INSTRUMENT / AIM-HUM-1973-001

    WABOT-1 humanoid robot

    A 1973 Waseda research machine brought bipedal walking, hands, and simple Japanese communication into one full-body humanoid.

    1973
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Waseda University WABOT Project · Ichiro Kato

    WABOT-1 humanoid robot Waseda University
    1973

    Why it is here

    Waseda University's history describes WABOT-1 as widely considered the first full-scale humanoid robot. Its record joins mechanisms and information systems in one inspectable body: the machine walked on two legs, grasped objects with its hands, and communicated in simple Japanese.

    What to notice

    This institutional retrospective does not settle an uncontested priority claim, demonstrate general autonomy, or show that the machine understood language. The Building 63 display status was checked from Waseda's 2026 record and is not permanent. Dimensions are not recorded here, and the credited page image is not reproduced because no open licence is stated.

    Creator
    Waseda University WABOT Project · Ichiro Kato
    Date
    1973
    Publisher / holder
    Waseda University
    Collection
    Waseda University · WABOT-1
    Physical size
    Not recorded by source
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  9. 09

    RESEARCH BOOK / AIM-BOOK-1984-001

    Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments

    A 754-page critical account of a rule-based expert-system research programme.

    1984
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Bruce G. Buchanan · Edward H. Shortliffe

    Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments Addison-Wesley edition; Columbia University author archive
    1984

    Why it is here

    Buchanan and Shortliffe edited a retrospective analysis of nearly a decade of MYCIN-related experiments. Its contents expose the work around the rule engine: acquiring knowledge, handling uncertainty, explaining conclusions, and evaluating a system.

    What to notice

    This is a research record, not medical guidance or a deployment certificate. Read how rules, uncertainty, explanation, evaluation, and human use were separated into design problems.

    Creator
    Bruce G. Buchanan · Edward H. Shortliffe
    Date
    1984
    Publisher / holder
    Addison-Wesley edition; Columbia University author archive
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  10. 10

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-1986-001

    Learning representations by back-propagating errors

    A concise account of adjusting network weights by propagating output error backward.

    1986
    PRIMARY RECORD

    David E. Rumelhart · Geoffrey E. Hinton · Ronald J. Williams

    Learning representations by back-propagating errors Nature
    1986

    Why it is here

    Rumelhart, Hinton, and Williams described repeatedly changing connection weights to reduce the difference between actual and desired outputs, allowing hidden units to acquire useful task features.

    What to notice

    The object documents one influential 1986 formulation. It does not establish that every later learning system uses the same procedure, or that the authors invented every ingredient.

    Creator
    David E. Rumelhart · Geoffrey E. Hinton · Ronald J. Williams
    Date
    1986-10-09
    Publisher / holder
    Nature
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  11. 11

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-1989-001

    Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition

    A Bell Labs paper records one trainable network reading normalized images of handwritten postal digits.

    1989
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Y. LeCun · B. Boser · J. S. Denker · D. Henderson · R. E. Howard · W. Hubbard · L. D. Jackel

    Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition Neural Computation, MIT Press
    1989

    Why it is here

    LeCun and colleagues describe putting task constraints into the network architecture and training a single network for the whole recognition operation, from a normalized character image to its final classification.

    What to notice

    The museum checked the abstract, not the full paper. This record supports the stated postal-digit task and image-to-classification path; it does not support calling the system the first convolutional network or a general-purpose vision system.

    Creator
    Y. LeCun · B. Boser · J. S. Denker · D. Henderson · R. E. Howard · W. Hubbard · L. D. Jackel
    Date
    1989-12-01
    Publisher / holder
    Neural Computation, MIT Press
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  12. 12

    PHYSICAL INSTRUMENT / AIM-CHP-1997-001

    Deep Blue custom chess chip, version 2

    A surviving version 2 processor made Deep Blue’s bounded chess search inspectable as dedicated hardware.

    1997
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Feng-Hsiung Hsu · IBM Research

    Deep Blue custom chess chip, version 2 Computer History Museum
    1997

    Why it is here

    The Computer History Museum dates this custom chip to 1997, credits its design to Feng-Hsiung Hsu, and records 1.5 million transistors running at 24 MHz. IBM Research’s publication record adds system context: the 1997 Deep Blue used 480 custom chess chips, which supplied most of its computational power.

    What to notice

    This is one chip, not the complete Deep Blue system, and specialised chess search is not general or human-like intelligence. The collection page records neither dimensions nor current display status, so both remain explicitly unrecorded here. Its image is copyrighted and is not reproduced.

    Creator
    Feng-Hsiung Hsu · IBM Research
    Date
    1997
    Publisher / holder
    Computer History Museum
    Collection
    Computer History Museum · 102645415
    Physical size
    Not recorded by source
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  13. 13

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-1997-001

    Long Short-Term Memory

    A journal paper proposes a gated recurrent method intended to keep error signals available across long time intervals.

    1997
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Sepp Hochreiter · Jürgen Schmidhuber

    Long Short-Term Memory Neural Computation, MIT Press
    1997

    Why it is here

    Hochreiter and Schmidhuber frame decaying error backflow as an obstacle to learning across long delays, then describe constant error flow through special units controlled by multiplicative gates.

    What to notice

    The museum checked the official bibliographic record and abstract, not the full paper. This object records the authors’ stated mechanism and artificial long-time-lag experiments; it does not establish a universal solution to memory or describe every later LSTM implementation.

    Creator
    Sepp Hochreiter · Jürgen Schmidhuber
    Date
    1997-11-15
    Publisher / holder
    Neural Computation, MIT Press
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  14. 14

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-2009-001

    ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database

    A conference paper records a shared visual database built with a WordNet hierarchy, web collection, and human verification.

    2009
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Jia Deng · Wei Dong · Richard Socher · Li-Jia Li · Kai Li · Li Fei-Fei

    ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database IEEE Computer Society / ImageNet
    2009

    Why it is here

    Deng and colleagues report 3.2 million images organized across 5,247 WordNet synsets and describe the collection and cleaning workflow, including internet search and human verification. The object makes data organization and label review visible as part of the AI system.

    What to notice

    The counts are a 2009 snapshot, not the current size of ImageNet. The paper does not show that the database alone caused the 2012 result, and this museum record does not reproduce its images.

    Creator
    Jia Deng · Wei Dong · Richard Socher · Li-Jia Li · Kai Li · Li Fei-Fei
    Date
    2009
    Publisher / holder
    IEEE Computer Society / ImageNet
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  15. 15

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-2012-001

    ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

    A conference paper joining a deep convolutional network, a large image benchmark, and GPU implementation.

    2012
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Alex Krizhevsky · Ilya Sutskever · Geoffrey E. Hinton

    ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25
    2012

    Why it is here

    Krizhevsky, Sutskever, and Hinton described training a large deep convolutional network on ImageNet, including architectural choices, a GPU implementation, and measures intended to reduce overfitting.

    What to notice

    Keep the claim inside the experiment: one architecture, one competition dataset, and reported test errors. “Deep learning won” is a later story, not a result printed by this object.

    Creator
    Alex Krizhevsky · Ilya Sutskever · Geoffrey E. Hinton
    Date
    2012
    Publisher / holder
    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  16. 16

    CASE STUDY / AIM-CAS-2014-001

    SAFFiR aboard ex-USS Shadwell

    A bipedal firefighting research robot photographed during a bounded shipboard test.

    2014
    An exposed-metal bipedal robot stands alone in a dark ship compartment, with cameras above its frame and cables around its feet.

    SAFFiR during testing aboard the Naval Research Laboratory's ex-USS Shadwell in Mobile, Alabama, on 6 November 2014.

    “Making Sailors 'SAFFiR' - Navy unveils Firefighting Robot prototype at Naval Tech EXPO [Image 7 of 8]” — John F. Williams; Wikimedia Commons (archival mirror) Image rights: DVIDS-PD-US · Public domain in the United States ↗

    Why it is here

    SAFFiR makes a 2014 human–robot control boundary visible in one machine: a humanoid body, sensors intended for smoke-filled spaces, hose manipulation, and an operator who could intervene. The official record lets visitors distinguish a demonstrated research loop from a finished autonomous service.

    What to notice

    This is a research-test record, not evidence of autonomous deployment. ONR says SAFFiR still took instructions from researchers at a console and retained human intervention. The record does not establish where the prototype is preserved today; the image's public-domain statement is limited to the United States and carries separate non-endorsement guidance.

    Creator
    Virginia Tech researchers
    Date
    2014-11-06
    Publisher / holder
    Office of Naval Research
    Display note
    Public-domain photograph · DVIDS-PD-US · US
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  17. 17

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-2016-001

    Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search

    A Nature paper records a Go system that combines learned policy and value networks with tree search.

    2016
    PRIMARY RECORD

    David Silver · Aja Huang · Chris J. Maddison · Arthur Guez · Laurent Sifre · George van den Driessche · Julian Schrittwieser · Ioannis Antonoglou · Veda Panneershelvam · Marc Lanctot · Sander Dieleman · Dominik Grewe · John Nham · Nal Kalchbrenner · Ilya Sutskever · Timothy Lillicrap · Madeleine Leach · Koray Kavukcuoglu · Thore Graepel · Demis Hassabis

    Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search Nature / Google DeepMind
    2016

    Why it is here

    Silver and colleagues describe training policy networks first from expert games and then through self-play, learning a value network from self-play positions, and using both to guide Monte Carlo tree search.

    What to notice

    Keep the claim inside this paper and the game of Go. Its reported five-game result against Fan Hui does not establish general intelligence, and this record does not cover the later Lee Sedol match or reproduce the paper’s figures.

    Creator
    David Silver · Aja Huang · Chris J. Maddison · Arthur Guez · Laurent Sifre · George van den Driessche · Julian Schrittwieser · Ioannis Antonoglou · Veda Panneershelvam · Marc Lanctot · Sander Dieleman · Dominik Grewe · John Nham · Nal Kalchbrenner · Ilya Sutskever · Timothy Lillicrap · Madeleine Leach · Koray Kavukcuoglu · Thore Graepel · Demis Hassabis
    Date
    2016-01-28
    Publisher / holder
    Nature / Google DeepMind
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  18. 18

    PAPER / AIM-DOC-2017-001

    Attention Is All You Need

    The paper that introduced the Transformer architecture.

    2017
    PRIMARY RECORD

    Ashish Vaswani · Noam Shazeer · Niki Parmar · Jakob Uszkoreit · Llion Jones · Aidan N. Gomez · Lukasz Kaiser · Illia Polosukhin

    Attention Is All You Need arXiv
    2017

    Why it is here

    The authors proposed an encoder–decoder architecture built around attention, without recurrence or convolution. The object matters because it gives a compact technical account of the architecture rather than a retrospective origin story.

    What to notice

    Start with Figure 1 and the model architecture section. Separate what the paper actually proposes from everything later products built on top of it.

    Creator
    Ashish Vaswani · Noam Shazeer · Niki Parmar · Jakob Uszkoreit · Llion Jones · Aidan N. Gomez · Lukasz Kaiser · Illia Polosukhin
    Date
    2017-06-12
    Publisher / holder
    arXiv
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
  19. 19

    RELEASE RECORD / AIM-WEB-2022-001

    Introducing ChatGPT

    The launch record for a conversational research preview.

    2022
    PRIMARY RECORD

    OpenAI

    Introducing ChatGPT OpenAI
    2022

    Why it is here

    OpenAI presented ChatGPT as a research preview and described a dialogue format that could answer follow-up questions, acknowledge mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject some inappropriate requests.

    What to notice

    Read the page as a launch document. Its examples, limitations, and deployment language show how the product was framed on release day—not how later versions behaved.

    Creator
    OpenAI
    Date
    2022-11-30
    Publisher / holder
    OpenAI
    Display note
    Metadata and commentary only
    Study this object→ Inspect the source record→
AI IN FACT · MUSEUM The living record of artificial intelligence.
Every sentence marked as a claim is linked to a source. Explanations, metaphors, and diagrams are editorial interpretation.